But if you are looking for quality customers …
YouTube led the way, with its average user spending 3 minutes 47 seconds on sites — more than 1 1/2 minutes longer than people referred by Facebook or Twitter. Google+ visitors stuck around for 3 minutes 8 seconds. Time on site from LinkedIn users was 2 minutes 13 seconds, narrowly longer than Facebook (2 minutes 7 seconds) and Twitter (2 minutes 3 seconds).
Shareaholic’s thinking on why visitors from YouTube hang out longer?
Why are visitors from YouTube so engaged? …because video itself is so engaging and viewers are likely to maintain a similar level of engagement with related content. Therefore, video watchers are especially receptive to links within video descriptions which complement the audio+visual content they just consumed. Another reason YouTube takes home the crown is because viewers are simply used to spending minutes — perhaps, hours — educating and entertaining themselves with awesome video and may have fewer qualms about taking extra time to discover more great content post-click.
Other findings of note:
- Page view multipliers were fairly low across the board, after YouTube’s 2.99 pages. The average G+ user viewed 2.45 pages, and LinkedIn, Facebook and Twitter hovered a bit over 2 pages.
- Facebook and Twitter are nearly identical when it comes to these metrics.
- Pinterest, Reddit and StumbleUpon users are the most fickle, viewing fewer pages on average, bouncing more often and spending an average of about 1 minute on a site.
Read more about Shareaholic’s findings here.
Here’s the data for the rankings:
And for reference here is Shareaholic’s most recent comparison of the social networks’ total referral traffic for the last four months of 2013:
0 comments:
Post a Comment